In January, the Seattle times published an opinion piece by Terrence Carroll and Sam Sperry titled "Church leaders should be careful influencing political campaigns" Http:// They were critical of Catholic church leaders attempting to influence voting on legislative issues as well as for political candidates, as religious tax exempt organization. Seattle Archbishop Alex Brunett was interviewed on a Church_State_signs local Catholic radio station about the piece. He was upset and critical of their views as well as them personally. He insisted his archdiocese and U.S. Catholic bishops had not advocated political candidates or legislative issues. The evidence to the contrary is overwhelming and indisputable.

The record of American bishop's extensive lobbying regarding legislative issues as well as advocating voting on political candidates is well known and open. This has been true historically, but in particular starting with the first Bush campaign when the bishops joined with conservative Protestant organizations in promoting George Bush over his opponents because of Bush’s stance on abortion and gay marriage. During the Kerry campaign their efforts were blatant and aggressive in their opposition to Kerry and support of Bush. Pronouncements that it was a mortal sin to vote for a candidate who supported women’s rights regarding abortion or gay rights were made and polictical literature distributed in church’s during that campaign. Again, during the last presidential campaign they were involved once again over abortion. Recently, In Washington where the vote involved the right to end one’s life, the local Catholic paper took strong stands against it and sermons were given, opposing it and oppposition literature was distributed in Catholic church’s. The most recent political lobbying by Catholic church bishops and pastors involves pre-emptive opposition to H.R. 1964, the Freedom of Choice Act, dealing with abortion. Literature is being distributed in the Catholic church's, opposition published in the Catholic media and sermons given in the church's opposing the bill.

The political involvement by Catholic bishops is not hidden. For example, in November of 2008 the nation’s Catholic bishops, meeting in Baltimore,  vowed to oppose the Obama adminstration over it’s position on abortion rights. Archbishop Joseph Naumann of the Diocese of Kansas City in Kansas said politicians "can't check your principles at the door of the legislature." Naumann has said repeatedly that Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, a Catholic Democrat who supports abortion rights, should stop taking Holy Communion until she changes her stance. He insists:

"They cannot call themselves Catholic when they violate such a core belief as the dignity of the unborn."

It is obvious that any claim that the Catholic bishops have not and are not  involved in open political activity, including advocacy to influence legislation as well as advocting voting on political candidates, is disingenuous at best and more accurately described as just plain false. They have done so publically, flagrantly and repeatedly.

The issue of sepration of church and state is an important one and is highly relevant to the conduct of the bishops, but is not the topic I am focusing on. It is also important to keep in mind the topic is not whether the bishops are morally correct. The only question is whether they are violating the law in doing so. Given the fact that the bishops and conservative republicans demand that people follow the law whether they like the law or not, their conduct is subject to scrutiny. Are they being hypocritical about obeying the law? Should they be sanctioned by removal of their tax exempt status when they violate the law? That’s the issue.

A good discussion of the issue of tax exemption and political advocacy by charitable organizations will be found in the Boston College Law Review of July 2001. In one of the articles, Professor Steffen N. Johnson outlines the law, Section 501 (c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. He says that if an charitable organization meets the criteria it will be given tax exempt status which means that it’s own income is tax exempt as well as contributions to it are tax deductible. However, he says, the law also imposes two restrictions on any political activity. First: "no substantial part" of their activities may constitute "carrying on propaganda" or otherwise attempting to "influence legislation." Second, the organization must not "participate in, or intervene in" (including publishing or distributing statements), any political campaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office. The lobbying restriction was passed in 1934 and the campaigning restriction in 1954.

Steffen points out the restriction on efforts "to persuade voters of the correctness of moral convictions that relate to candidates for public office" is absolute. Activities of this kind are completely barred. As Steffen says about this:

"Taken at face value, organizations that wish to enjoy the benefit of tax exempt status may not say a word "on behalf of" or "in opposition" to a political candidate. The statute adopts a "zero tolerance" policy…"

Among Catholics as well as the general public, there is an increasing view that action should be taken for the violation of law by the American bishops:  It would seem apparent that the Catholic bishops should not be allowed to enjoy the benefits of a tax exempt status and at the same time break that law by trying to dictate the actions of American voters in the voting booth. It seems to me that if they insist on exercising what they claim is their right to give  "moral guidance" and what everyone knows is good old fashion politics, in violation  the law, they should pay the consequences. If they don’t believe they have to follow the laws of this country, whether they like them or not, then they should suffer the sanction of a law breaker and have their tax exemption taken away. Whether they are morally right in their political positions or not, they shouldn't be allowed to have it both ways and be tolerated as law violators merely because they are bishops. There should be an investigation by tax authorities into the activities of the American bishops to determine if they are breaking the law by their aggressive political activity and if they are, to sanction them for doing it.


  1. Hi.
    I found your Web Site by Google
    And I wish you the best you can get,
    the peace of God through Jesus Christ.

    Welcome to visit my Site.
    Allan Svensson, Sweden

    The Bridegroom comes, Come out to meet him. Matt. 25:6.
    From where shall we go out? We shall go out of the great
    Babylon, the great whore. Rev. Chapter 17 and 18. This
    command of the Lord in Rev. 18:4 is now highly topical.

    Never before we have been so nearly Jesus’ coming as we
    are now, but how are God’s people prepared? How is the
    unity in the faith? Sorry, very bad! God’s people are more
    divided now than ever before. Instead of following what
    the Bible teaches about the Assembly of God, they have
    followed Satan’s false assembly doctrine. They believe
    that the Assembly of God is constituted of church systems
    and many religious organizations.

    Most Christians have not yet begun to prepare for Jesus’
    coming. They can speak and write that Jesus shall come,
    and about the signs of the time, yet they do not make any
    preparation to meet Jesus. How can we make a preparation?
    To make preparation and be ready for Jesus’ coming, God’s
    people must get the knowledge of the Assembly of God.

    All God’s people must in the first hand begin to study what
    the Bible teaches about the Assembly of God. What we
    need now before the restoration of the Assembly of God,
    it is humility before God’s word and a forgivable disposition
    to each other.

    The Assembly of God is no Pentecostal church. Please,
    consider what this expression “the Assembly of God” in the
    reality implies. The Assembly of God must be the same as
    the Greek word “ekklesia”, and the Body of Christ. 1 Cor.
    12:12-31. Then it is easy to understand that this has nothing
    to do with the Pentecostal Movement. Pentecostal churches
    have existed about 100 years, but the Assembly of God has
    ever existed since Jesus baptized his first disciples by the
    Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit gave them the new life in Christ
    so that they became born anew. Then the Assembly of God
    was born. The truth of the Assembly of God has never been
    preached in the churches.

    The Bridegroom comes, Come out to meet him

    Evil spirits in the churches

    The great falling away

    What does hinder the Antichrist to appear?
    What is the Restrainer?

    KJV, “the best English Bible” but not perfect

    Why did the Pentecostal Revival take an end?

    The truth of the baptism by the Holy Spirit and the new birth

    Jesus cannot come today because God’s people are not ready

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *